Influencer Emilie Kiser is seeking to prevent the release of public records related to her son’s tragic death. After her 3-year-old son Trigg tragically passed away on May 18, following a near-drowning incident in a Chandler, Arizona, pool, Kiser filed a lawsuit in Maricopa County Superior Court. The suit aims to keep critical records surrounding the incident, referred to as an “accidental drowning,” out of the public eye.
Kiser’s attorneys assert that the family “desperately wants to grieve in private” but are being forced into the public spotlight due to intense media attention. Despite these wishes, the case remains in court, and a judge will ultimately decide whether the records should remain sealed or be released to the public.
Understanding Public Records and Why They Matter
Public records such as police reports and emergency service calls are generally accessible to the public in the United States. These records are crucial for ensuring transparency and accountability in government actions. Under the federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), agencies are required to provide public access to records, though each state has specific guidelines regarding which documents can be disclosed.
In the case of Kiser, a staggering 100-plus requests were submitted to the City of Chandler and Maricopa County Medical Examiner’s Office seeking information about Trigg’s death. Despite Kiser’s lawsuit, news organizations like USA TODAY also filed requests for police records shortly after the tragic incident.
However, Arizona law allows authorities to redact certain sensitive details from these records to safeguard privacy. For instance, video footage might be edited to protect the identity of victims, in compliance with state statutes.
Arizona’s Law on Sealing Public Records
Arizona’s legal framework provides a mechanism to seal public records if their release would cause “substantial and irreparable harm.” In cases like Kiser’s, individuals can appeal to the courts to prevent the release of such records if the information poses a risk to personal privacy or public safety.
The lawsuit also claims that numerous records have been requested for “commercial purposes” rather than to monitor government activity. Arizona law, however, distinguishes news media inquiries from commercial purposes, implying that journalists and news organizations are generally exempt from these restrictions.
How Emilie Kiser’s Public Persona Could Influence the Outcome
Kiser’s status as a social media influencer adds complexity to the case. Craig Weiner, a partner at Blank Rome law firm, highlighted that public figures like Kiser often face a heightened level of scrutiny because they are public by choice. “When individuals choose to share their lives on a platform that monetizes personal content, it complicates their claims to privacy,” Weiner explained.
Because Kiser’s online presence is part of her career, the judge may weigh this factor heavily in determining whether public access to the records outweighs her privacy interests. “Public figures can’t always claim privacy when they’re openly sharing personal moments,” Weiner added.
The Emotional Toll on Kiser’s Family
Despite the legal complexities, Kiser’s emotional distress is undeniable. Her lawsuit emphasizes that the public release of the records would be a “profound invasion of privacy” and could cause lasting harm to her and her surviving family members. Kiser, who is still coping with the loss of her son, has expressed that every day is a battle as she tries to support her surviving son, two-month-old Theodore.
As Kiser navigates this heartbreaking ordeal, the lawsuit underlines the broader debate of balancing public access to information with the right to personal privacy, especially when it involves vulnerable families during times of immense grief.
For more on the latest new, visit our Digital News Alerts.
